Toxic ExposureEvidence Center
All articles
PACT ActJuly 9, 20266 min read

The PACT Act: What It Actually Changed and Why Most Veterans Still Have Not Filed

Signed in August 2022, the PACT Act is the largest expansion of toxic exposure benefits in VA history. Here is what it really did, what it did not do, and the three misunderstandings that keep eligible veterans from filing.

By Albert Thombs · VA-accredited claims agent #45147

The PACT Act: What It Actually Changed and Why Most Veterans Still Have Not Filed

The Sergeant First Class Heath Robinson Honoring our Promise to Address Comprehensive Toxics Act became law on August 10, 2022 as Public Law 117-168. Almost four years later, the single most common thing I hear on a first phone call is still some version of the same sentence: "I heard about the PACT Act, but I do not think it applies to me."

Usually it does. So let us take the law apart and look at what it actually says.

What the law actually did

The PACT Act did four separate things. They get blended together in the news coverage, and that is where the confusion starts.

  1. It created a presumption of exposure for veterans who served in specific places on or after specific dates. If you served there, VA must concede you were exposed to burn pits and other airborne hazards. You no longer have to prove it happened.
  2. It added conditions to the presumptive list — the illnesses VA will connect to that exposure without you having to prove medical causation.
  3. It expanded VA health care eligibility and required VA to offer a toxic exposure screening to every enrolled veteran.
  4. It changed how VA has to consider exposure in every claim, even one that never gets a presumption, through a required review of a veteran's toxic exposure history.

Notice what is not on that list: the PACT Act did not make anyone automatically rated. It did not pay anyone. It removed an argument you used to have to win. That is enormous, and it is not the same as an approval.

The covered locations and dates

This is the part worth writing on a sticky note. Under 38 CFR § 3.320, the burn pit and airborne hazard presumption of exposure covers active military, naval, air, or space service in these locations:

On or after August 2, 1990

  • Bahrain
  • Iraq
  • Kuwait
  • Oman
  • Qatar
  • Saudi Arabia
  • Somalia
  • United Arab Emirates
  • The neutral zone between Iraq and Saudi Arabia
  • The airspace above any of the above

On or after September 11, 2001

  • Afghanistan
  • Djibouti
  • Egypt
  • Jordan
  • Lebanon
  • Syria
  • Uzbekistan
  • Yemen
  • The airspace above any of the above

Read that list again slowly. Djibouti. Egypt. Jordan. Uzbekistan. Those are the ones veterans skip past. A logistics run through Ali Al Salem, a rotation at Camp Lemonnier, sixty days at Karshi-Khanabad — that is service in a covered location. The presumption does not require a combat deployment, a Purple Heart, or a year on the ground.

The conditions the PACT Act added

For the covered locations above, these are presumptive under the burn pit and airborne hazards provisions:

Cancers

  • Head cancer of any type
  • Neck cancer of any type
  • Respiratory cancer of any type
  • Gastrointestinal cancer of any type
  • Reproductive cancer of any type
  • Lymphoma of any type
  • Lymphomatic cancer of any type
  • Kidney cancer
  • Brain cancer
  • Melanoma
  • Pancreatic cancer

Respiratory and other illnesses

  • Asthma diagnosed after service
  • Chronic bronchitis
  • Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)
  • Chronic rhinitis
  • Chronic sinusitis
  • Constrictive or obliterative bronchiolitis
  • Emphysema
  • Granulomatous disease
  • Interstitial lung disease
  • Pleuritis
  • Pulmonary fibrosis
  • Sarcoidosis

The phrase "of any type" is doing real work in that cancer list. Head, neck, respiratory, gastrointestinal, reproductive, lymphoma and lymphomatic cancers are presumptive regardless of the specific histology. That is a much wider net than most rating decisions I read seem to appreciate.

The Act also added hypertension and monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) to the Agent Orange presumptive list for herbicide-exposed veterans — a separate provision that has nothing to do with burn pits, and one that quietly opened the door for a very large number of Vietnam-era veterans.

The three misunderstandings that stop people from filing

1. "Presumptive means automatic"

It does not. A presumption removes the exposure argument and the medical causation argument. It does not remove the diagnosis requirement, and it does not remove the severity question that decides your percentage.

You still need a current diagnosis in the record, made by someone qualified to make it. And you still need measured findings — pulmonary function tests for a respiratory claim, incapacitating episode counts for sinusitis, biopsy and staging for a cancer — because that is what the rating schedule assigns percentages against. Veterans with a rock-solid presumptive claim get 0 percent and 10 percent decisions all the time, purely because nobody documented severity.

2. "I already got denied for this, so it is over"

This is the expensive one. If VA denied a condition before the PACT Act existed, and that condition is now presumptive, the old denial was decided under a law that no longer applies. A Supplemental Claim (VA Form 20-0995) is the path, and a change in law is exactly the kind of thing that supports one.

Effective dates on those cases can reach back further than people expect. It is worth having someone read the old decision rather than assuming.

3. "I was never in combat, so I was not exposed"

Burn pits were logistics infrastructure, not a combat activity. Everything a base disposed of went into them — plastics, medical waste, batteries, tires, petroleum products, treated wood, human waste, unexploded ordnance, and whatever the mess hall threw out — and it burned in the open, often with jet fuel as an accelerant, sometimes for years within a mile of where people slept.

Cooks, fuel handlers, admin clerks, aircraft mechanics, and contracting officers breathed that air for the same twelve-month rotation as everybody else. If you slept downwind of a burn pit, your MOS is irrelevant to the exposure question.

What to do this week

  1. File an Intent to File. One form, ten minutes, and it locks your effective date for up to a year while you gather evidence. Filing it costs you nothing and can be worth thousands in back pay.
  2. Ask for your toxic exposure screening. The PACT Act requires VA to offer it to every enrolled veteran. It creates a dated entry in VA's own record showing you raised military exposure — which years later becomes evidence that the concern predated the diagnosis.
  3. Pull your deployment records. Your DD-214, travel vouchers, orders, award citations, evaluations, and mobilization orders are what establish that you were in a covered location on a covered date.
  4. Get the severity measured. Not "my breathing is bad." A spirometry report with FEV-1 and FVC values, a sleep study, an imaging report, a specialist's staging note. Numbers are what the rating schedule reads.
  5. Read your old denials. Every one of them. The PACT Act may have removed the exact reason you were denied.

The honest summary

The PACT Act was a genuine structural win. It moved the burden of proof on exposure off the veteran's shoulders for millions of people, and it did so retroactively in the sense that old denials can be reopened.

What it did not do is make VA generous, careful, or fast. Claims still get denied for missing diagnoses. Ratings still come in low because nobody measured anything. Examiners still write one-line opinions that do not survive scrutiny.

The law handed you a much better hand. You still have to play it.

pact actburn pitspresumptive conditionsfilingtoxic exposure

Albert Thombs

VA-Accredited Claims Agent #45147 · 702-992-4883

No claims advice or representation without a signed VA Form 21-22a on file. This article is educational — not legal, medical, or claims advice. Accreditation is governed by 38 CFR § 14.629.

General educational information only — not legal or medical advice, and not affiliated with the VA. Any ratings or dollar figures are estimates that depend on your specific situation and the VA's decision.

Want a second set of eyes?

Free tools first. An accredited human when the case demands more.

If you'd like an accredited review of where your evidence chain broke, Albert Thombs (VA-accredited claims agent #45147) can take a look. No pressure — you decide when to reach out.

VA-Accredited Claims Agent #45147

Think a denial or low rating was wrong?

Tell an accredited agent what happened. We review your situation first and tell you honestly whether we can help — before anyone signs anything.

An accredited agent personally reviews every request — we’ll reach out within 48 hours.

Call 702-992-4883